🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours before the New York race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange issued a bold forecast – not just who would win citywide, and block by block. The analyst, a political analyst who grew up in New York City, has spent more than ten years in left-leaning activism and has become a kind of well-known figure recently for his deep dives into city data and polling.

He published his extremely precise prediction map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate would win while failed to predict the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. He has a flair for clever terms. He pointed out, as an example, the split between the “commie corridor”, stretching from one neighborhood to another area to a third locale, where he predicted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, “the Free Press and financial newspapers surpass the New York Times” in readership and most voters favored Cuomo, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Trends and Unexpected Results

What was your night?

I had to do that because they were dropping around 200,000 ballots into the system every few minutes! I felt somewhat anxious at the beginning: The candidate was ahead the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but there were two big batches of votes added after that and the advantage went from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, there was a world in which election day turned out somewhat badly for Mamdani, where the opponent would have essentially doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. However Mamdani gained half a million votes to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He went out and massively expanded his support from the primary.

Expanding Support

Where did Mamdani gain those extra votes from?

He assembled the coalition that the left long aimed for: diverse racially, youthful, it’s renters and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He gained significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the primary. Additionally he boosted his core of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He created the alliance that progressives long aimed for: diverse, youthful, renters and residents struggling with costs

There were also some supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It is a genuine phenomenon, limited to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Muslims. Voters in immigrant strongholds that supported Trump last year backed the progressive this year. However it’s not that he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Turnout and Effects

One of the big stories of the election was the sky-high participation. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Participation was much greater than I had expected. I figured we might go over two million, but it reached 2.3 million – that is a huge number of participants. There was a decent anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but his supporters was also motivated, and that was enough to secure victory.

You predicted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Currently it appears he’s favored to get over half. He’s at just over 50% but remain around 200K ballots uncounted at that time. So I don’t think certain, but I think probable, and I hope he does so afterwards none can claim Sliwa was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His support plummeted.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any area. Including Tottenville in Staten Island, similar to an highly conservative neighborhood. That truly surprised me. The independent kept Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and then added all of these conservatives on Staten Island with a high participation. I think there was significant tactical voting by GOP voters. This happened before Trump tweeted his support for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome if Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your much mentioned “commie corridor” – did backing for the candidate overwhelming in those parts of the boroughs?

I think existed a little dilution of the progressive zone in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. There, instance, the property owners and homeowners supported the independent. So there was a little resistance. However overall, mostly the leftist base is another huge reason why Zohran won – he scored between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the election there was coverage on whether Mamdani was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he did?

Exist neighborhoods with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – like specific locales – where he did well. However in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Manhattan area, his position on Israel definitely mattered there. Likewise in the moderate communities like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned Cuomo. Plus, there are Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, they were strongly Cuomo. So I don’t know if existed crazy narrative-busters here, but he retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what New York means politically? Will the commie corridor become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s not accidental that key figures from progressives come from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that we’ll see additional examples – people will emerge from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

However I believe that every city in America can have similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the epicenters of progressive influence in America – because they’re young, people rent and they are places where individuals struggle by the inequalities we face.